<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Xavier Jarquin: Poison Pen Letters</title>
		<description>Discuss Xavier Jarquin: Poison Pen Letters</description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:48:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/207.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Is this a formula to have a headache?</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My gosh! What a load of confusion, contradiction, over-exhausting-boring-perplexing-e xplaining! Truly painful, please delete at least half as 1/4 through I had already seen the point! I have never seen any one who "does not care" go at such length to... I do not know what the heck he was trying to accomplish, sorry I am probably being too harsh but I felt truly frustrated reading these letters... I better stop here and go in session instead. Bye]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pedro Perez</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:30:56 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Koos says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the explanation guys. I jumped the gun with my response when I saw private emails posted. You have explained your reasons very well and all things considered, information on these plants and how the operate, do need to be shown to others so they know what to look out for.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Koos</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:53:55 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Yours</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Koos, I agree fully. However it's in even worse taste to use Scientology in reverse. In the interest of protection others, I have published just SOME of the torrent of third party communications this fellow has been emitting around the clock to the entire "independent field" -- 14,171 words not including his posts on various boards on the matter, and all of this despite the fact that I personally never posted a single thing about him. Dan Koon wrote only 5 words. If he was sincere, his first action would have been to pick up the [censored]one. He knows my [censored]one number already. When confronted by a situation in which all choices are unpleasant, the optimum solution is to select the least destructive. The purpose of this article is education, not retribution. People need to understand the pattern so they can recognize it and not be victimized. This is also entirely in keeping with my policy of transparency. What I have not done is publish the list of who he sent the emails to, nor have I published anyone else's emails to Xavier. This protects the privacy of the field. All things considered, I believe I have chosen the most ethical response to this particular situation. I checked with various other people before I wrote the article and they agreed it was the correct thing to do. OSA's entire plan (which we heard about even before they launched it) was to manipulate people in order to create a situation that could be trumped up as "evidence" of third party. In other words, Xavier originated that he was the "victim" of a third party campaign, when nothing like that even existed. Only five words from Dan Koon had ever been published publicly. It is another example of the criminal mind at work: accusing others of what they themselves are doing. Xavier is running the third party campaign.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:00:22 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-700</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jim Logan says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-702</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Koos, Since a bunch of the above 'pm's' were to me, and cc'ed to others originally, there was no expectation of 'privacy'. There is no violation of written or tacit protocols. No Emily Post violations. No violation of either my (since I consent) or X's expectation of privacy, since he himself began the public 'splat' of his messages. Indeed, it would appear, he himself intended that these mails be published and spread far and wide. Well, he got his wish.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jim Logan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:04:29 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-702</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jim Logan says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sinar, He told me twice he was going to block my mails and 'move on'. In fact, he only stopped the verbose, 1.1 rants on the night of the publication of the articles here. Whoever was writing these mails, either Xavier himself, or others in his name, i.e., proper, by and for, it seems the truth as-ised: that is, they are no longer coming. I'd say Steve hit a right Why.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jim Logan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:03:53 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-701</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Koos says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Regardless of what the issues you are having with Xavier are, it is in very bad taste to post personal messages on a message board. It's not nice and against the rules of private messaging.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Koos</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:22:40 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-696</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck Beatty says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-687</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thanks Steve for posting Xavier's emails. I think it is historically important to expose ALL "intell gathering" still being done. It shows where official Scientology is still at. There is a long history of this. Every new ex Sea Org person who causes official Scientology some distraction, loss of stats, disaffection amongst their ranks, will be targetted, straight per the OSA stats system. Mike Rinder would do well to detail the OSA org board, stats, how those contribute to the constant selection of who they consider are causing them the MOST downstats. And when you expose their spy/plant/agent provacateurs/PI handlers, you cause them a blown covert operation statistic, which is itself a minus load of stats. It's all about stats, and a handful in OSA Int will eat it on the exposing of all the spies/plants each time it happens. This is a public service, I'm glad you independents are just being public about it all, as it happens. It sadly shows to others who've learned the hard way the last couple decades, that "things are NOT changing" in the bigger official movement. Official Scientology is still doing the OSA Int org board, specifically the intell gathering (see the sites with the OSA Network Orders, see Wikileaks for the most OSA Network Orders in one place). Be good, and be high principled! Thank you Steve and all the others. Best, Chuck Beatty]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Chuck Beatty</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:29:17 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-687</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sinar says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-681</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jim, It's amusing to find out on the 13th XJ says he's "moving on" as I told him he was Dev-T and cut my facebook line to him. Moving on in the 14th, sends all this verbiage to you. I guess I misunderstood what "moving on" meant. I started all this regurgitation (which really surprised me) as I wanted to know the truth of the matter as to his status as a plant - perhaps he didn't see Dan's post or could not respond appropriately.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sinar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:22:58 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-681</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>James says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-676</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now that I've finished cleaning the liquid off of my computer and got the keyboard working again, after reading OneUponaTime's response, all I can say is X seems to be explaining way too much when a simple "whatever" would do for me.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:43:03 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-676</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>wizard says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-671</link>
			<description><![CDATA['Me thinks he doth protest too much'. He seems to need a call real bad, can someone just give the guy a hug.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>wizard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:48:04 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-671</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kirsi Ojamo says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-670</link>
			<description><![CDATA[yawn. Way too many meaningless words from mr X for my taste. But thanks Thoughtful for letting us in on him.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kirsi Ojamo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:15:08 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-670</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>aja claire says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-668</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Jeeeeeezus, that's A LOT of denial in response to 5 little words! OSA should be ashamed of themselves for putting a product/plant of this quality out into our field. (Who's running that outfit these days, anyway?) We demand better spies - this is just insulting.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>aja claire</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:51:40 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-668</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>trans-what?</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-665</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think I have a new favorite word: "Honey, you don't have to pick up cottage cheese today because the milk has transcurred--and boy is it delicious!" Yum, yum. Or, "Oh my god! The cat has just transcurred and is barking again! We need to get her to the vet!" p.s. Being a plant shouldn't cause one shame. Some of my best friends are plants. I often have them over for dinner. Artichokes, avocados, celery, spinach, apples, oranges, blueberries--god, I just love them. And in the garden? All the new coral bells add wonderful color to shady spots with their vibrant foliage. Just remember: 1. It ain't important unless you make it important. And a problem is only a problem when you provide the counter-intention or counter-force. 2. Independent Scientologists have better training, more understanding, greater integrity, more true friends, more support, more communication channels, more options, greater happiness, a frigging far better chance of making actual OT, etc. than those left inside DM's corrupted church. So, the odds of turning plants is greater then the plant's odds of disrupting the Independent movement. Plus, we have far more spies inside Miscavology than DM can place in the field. And think of how many spies and plants he would have to send forth to cover the entire Independent field. It would be like Vietnam or Afghanistan. Too many places to hide and the enemy constantly cropping up in new and unexpected places. His position is fixed and vulnerable. The independent field is amor[censored]ous and fabian. DM is wasting his resources. And stopping to handle a barking dog while we're rushing to a fire is a waste of ours. Michael]]></description>
			<dc:creator>OnceUponaTime</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:26:20 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-665</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jim Logan says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-667</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is what I said to X on 17 Dec. Keep in mind, after almost 20 years of no contact, out of the blue and on HIS origination, I was cc'ed on the issue between he and Dan. My interest was to find out why he was spouting on about his disagreements with LRH and Scn. His vitriol was directed at them at first, then me personally. "Xavier, My question remains unanswered. If you haven't found any 'research papers' then you haven't read the subject. Holy cats, there's only like thousands of tapes, millions of words, all sorts of reference to the materials he studied and on and on. This comment you've made is inane. I'm going to go on the assumption you are either a complete imbecile or you are a 'plant'. Either one doesn't fly for a friendship with me right now. My advice, no matter what situation you're in, and the above two aren't necessarily the limits on what that could be, is to re-evaluate your present circumstances and somehow, move up the line in KRC. You can't possibly believe, knowing what you know of what I've stated publicly, that I'm gonna go for any of this bullshit you're feeding me. Either way, you've sold your integrity for a mass of pottage. Someday, you and I will hopefully be on the same page again. Until then, get up the Bridge, for real, do the BC, study the materials, audit. This dev-t is just that. Tomorrow, I'm going to continue with my next OT level. What are you going to do? Jim Logan"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jim Logan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:51:42 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-667</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-660</link>
			<description><![CDATA[HCOB 2 May 62 came to mind with all this bombast.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:47:45 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-660</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wow</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow. That is a lot of splaining. lol Lucy? What have you done?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Flur</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:17:58 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/xavier-jarquin-poison-pen-letters.html#comment-659</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
