<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>LRH's legacy </title>
		<description>Discuss LRH's legacy </description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:46:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/278.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>David Mayo Article</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-2113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This article was originally published in The Journal of the Advanced Ability Centre April 1985 by David Mayo. I reprinted it in the very first issue of the FREE THETA in January 2005, 20 years later as a mark of respect for David Mayo. (This issue can be downlaoded form the IFA website) I seems to have done the rounds since then but, of course, loses nothing in the retelling. As has been pointed, out it speaks volumes that LRH would entrust David Mayo with his life.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:59:51 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-2113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Guest says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1659</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Michael, I undestand what you mean and I agre with you. Thanks for the comm! Much love, Alex]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:43:16 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1659</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I totally agree with your assessment WH, though I never met the man personally. I did have my own personal run in with him regarding a technical point that I did an Orders Query on per the PL. Any way there was none of the viscousness that the current organization manifests when questioned about their infallibility. None of the strained efforts to get me to "agree" with a blatantly illegal order by force feeding me snippets of various references in Qual that kinda sorta justify their overt and then being subjected to "ethics" when I continued to be "disaffected" or whatever. No, the whole matter was handled exactly per the PL and after the Ol'man got into the debate we found out that I was right to query him and the order was cancelled. So Mayo wasn't perfect. None of us are. And if he had have been handled standardly as personally requested by Ron. Instead of being forced to run around a tree in the blazing California sun for 10-15 hours a day. He might have been salvaged and we wouldn't be having this discussion. So current management (not just Miscavige) to a large degree is responsible for laying the foundation for the Advanced Ability Center, Ron's Org, the Freezone and various other squirrel groups at the time due to their own intransigence. Isn't it interesting how they have snapped terminals with the former enemies they themselves created? Now what organization is the biggest squirrel group on the planet? A rhetorical question. Since we all know the answer to that. As the old saying goes. It takes one to know one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:41:25 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1656</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OnceUponaTime says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1645</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Steve, Thanks for the clarification. Always want to move toward truth. Towards increased ARC. Towards increased KRC. Towards a greater regard for our fellows. Much love, Michael]]></description>
			<dc:creator>OnceUponaTime</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:50:15 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1645</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OnceUponaTime says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1644</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Alex, Understood. Every level and action has an EP. My comment to you was just an observation about what I had run into, which might indicate to others. Far too much O/R on O/W's. Far too many bad indicators. Far too much make-wrong as regards running overts. Lot of theory behind this in the basics. Some has to do with viewpoints and getting back into valence vs. perceiving the world through a third dynamic consideration (a type of viewpoint.) Getting back into valence always improves perception and ability to be audited. I believe the L's address postulates in regards to overts. But, like I said, this isn't the forum for addressing the fine points of tech. But, it is a forum for expressing hope and expansion. Much love, Michael]]></description>
			<dc:creator>OnceUponaTime</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:49:49 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1644</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah they should call it the six month sec check. Ron would have never got 'em because they never existed as such at that time. As I wrote they were just a "check" to see if the case was running well. Solo auditors need cramming and correction every once in a while just like regular auditors. Also a Solo Auditor may hit the EP and bypass it. Things like that can happen. The six month check like every other action in the Church has been perverted into something else. In fact its become Flags stable income! Forget about case cracking, which used to be Flag's specialty. Since tough cases are no longer welcome at the Mecca of Technical Deception. Forget about the L's, since there are very few XIIs left to deliver them. Or any of the other Flag Rundowns, since they aren't training any auditors any more. Their "bread and butter" is these Sec Checks. That way they can rack up the hours and charge for accommodations. It has nothing to do with handling cases anymore. Pretty soon Flag will be as desolate as every other org on the planet.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:33:29 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlexMetheny says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1631</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Michael, Thanks for the comm. I am not sure about the native state on O/W's but I do believe that they have there place in case gain. I also believe they can be interposed where they do not belong or can be enforced onto one and create very bad effects. I re-read C/S series 73 tonight about not mixing major actions and what should be run in the non-interference zones. To me clearly the 6 month sec-check line is a clear violation of the tech. I have seen many BI's pre-OT's at Flag coming out of these enforced O/W festivals. In my opinion they are used for monetary gain and political purposes for the most part. If it really was for "security" it isn't working and shoud be abandoned just based on that. If you had reasonably priced auditing and had the auditing done with only the care of the PC or pre-OT in mind I think you would have a very different scene than what you will find in the C of M today.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlexMetheny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:09:51 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1631</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Guest says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1619</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm going to weight in with a bit of my own personal observation dating from 1977-1983. David Mayo wasn't warm and fuzzy. He never spoke to anyone that I ever saw. He and John Eastment would stand in the elevator together and never even look at each other. I thought this was beyond weird; having come from CCLA - where honest openness and friendliness was the way. Merrill Mayo audited Yvonne when she was dying. David Mayo was the CS. Not long after that he started a relationship with Julie (forgot her last name). I believe they are currently married. Not sure what happened to Merrill. Fast forward -- Bill Franks - ED Int - blew - around 1983 -- Mayo came to see Franks -- didn't salvage him. Not much after that I believe Mayo was declared - started his own group and the rest became squirrel history. Before starting his own group he connected up with Bent Corydon (both ole New Zealanders or Aussies). Is Mayo an SP? No -- I don't think so. And yes, he's been horribly maligned. And yes, he didn't deserve it. But, he's no warm and fuzzy. (next to dm EVERYONE is warm and fuzzy) But as RJ stated above -- the hagiogra[censored]y is bizarre. (good word BTW had to look it up :-) WH]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:49:50 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1619</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlexMetheny says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1617</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi RJ, Ya, they might as well call them 6 month sec checks. And I don't think LRH was getting them. I agree the way they are done and mixed with Solo Nots is out tech to say the least and it is like some CIA interrogation technique, not FOR the Pre-OT.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlexMetheny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:17:21 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1617</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1616</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree with you Thoughtful Steve. I worked on the "Squirrel Busters" Project and there was never any effort by RTC to get Ron's imprimatur on it. It was totally RTC's show! Just like the Mission Holders Conference in San Francisco two years earlier. One purpose was to show the public that RTC could hold the technical line against "squirrels" and Mayo's AAC was a primary target. So I personally doubt if such a dispatch existed. Problem with the internet, is that its so easy to forge documents to support an agenda. Also the current hagiogra[censored]y on Mayo is sometimes hard to take. He wasn't as virtuous as many people claim he now is.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:54:10 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1616</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thought provoking says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1615</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Steve, I also found the Mayo's audio to what you wrote. It is from a talk around '83 - '84. Here is the link. [censored]://tinyurl.com/399r95 Another thing that I found interesting to listen to and seems appropriate to the Independents was a talk on dissalusionment. I don't have the link but it can be found through You Tube search: David Mayo, A talk on dissolussionment - Parts 1 - 4. Each part is about 10 minutes but it was worthwhile listening. It is very interesting to observe the difference in beingness of Mayo and DM.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thought provoking</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:59:15 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1615</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does anyone know the current location of David May</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1614</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Steve for the post. You can't write this stuff in a film script...no one would believe you. Seems to me Mayo has the upper OT levels in his possession. How do we get Mayo to return and wear his tech hat once again?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jack Airey</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:58:56 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1614</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>understanding DM</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1628</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am going to try to help you guys understand something about DM. First, LRH said that any datum is as valuable as it has been evaluated. LRH also said that a datum could be evaluated by comparing it to a datum of comparable magnitude. So I would suggest that you look up the word insane in your own dictionary, and find the definition that would apply to a crazy person. Then, try to think of a few examples of DM using reverse Dianetics to handle people at Gold, and a few examples of DM putting Clears on NED, or you could look at the similarity betweed DM's handling of Lisa Mc[censored]earson and Nancy Many. At this point, you might be in denial. Next, you should rent 3 movies, "Silence of the Lambs", "Hannibal", and "Manhunter". You might get nightmares, but you should at least be able to understand DM by the time you have watched the movies. Then, you should read what LRH has to say about the anti-social person. And remember, hindsight really is 20/20.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:37:43 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1628</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marty\'s views on Mayo</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1618</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Asked Marty about Mayo today and this is what he said, Dan Koon and Sinar also knew Mayo and both said yesterday that Mayo was a decent man -- not an SP. I'm sure he had his faults, we all do. The plus point here is that we have established the freedom to communicate with the data ourselves as Scientologists.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:35:59 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1618</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dating of the article</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1610</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have seen an earlier version of this text. There was a note in front, "(edited extracts published in the Journal of the Advanced Ability Centre, April 1985)" There are some lectures of David Mayo from his AAC Sunday talks in the net and there are also videos on Youtube. They are worth watching. To see his warmth and ARC has handled for me all the noise I had heard or read about him on the "official" lines before.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:59:24 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1610</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marty and Mayo</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1608</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So why is Marty so anti-Mayo? He seems convinced that Mayo wanted to ruin the church, or so says his blog if I remember correctly. When I read that I had to scratch my head and wonder.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>OnceUponaTime</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:27:43 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1608</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OnceUponaTime says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Alex, Odd that you should mention this [censored]enomenon on sec checking. I recently encountered something similar and discovered there is a clear-like state on running overts. In NED running out the postulates stripped away the engrams and made clears. Because considerations, postulates and opinions are the basis of overts more than actions, you can eventually get to a native state on the subject. Thus running more overts merely acts very much like running engrams after going clear. I realize that even after going clear we can still have [censored]ysical and emotional difficulties, which can be handled elsewhere. Same applies to O/W's. Rehabbing this clear-on-overts condition gave me more gains than going clear. It really boosted theta perceptions. There's a lot more about this, but that's for another forum. Michael]]></description>
			<dc:creator>OnceUponaTime</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:24:05 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>War and Peace says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1604</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thoughtful ~~ Did you examine the link ? [censored]://www.freezone.org/repor ts/e_ssqpjt.htm Did you see the document ? I am more than familiar with dispatches from "Special Projects Ops" over a considerable period of time and I do not believe this is forgery. I will ask Larry Brennan to weigh in. He received much communication from "Special Project Ops" = David Miscavige. War and Peace]]></description>
			<dc:creator>War and Peace</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:22:58 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1604</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thoughtful says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1600</link>
			<description><![CDATA[War and Peace -- For sure DM is the Tony Montana of Scientology, however I don't think this dispatch is valid. Myself and two other Int staff who would know have never heard of this dispatch and we think it's a fake.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:42:40 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1600</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reverse (Black)  Scientology</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1602</link>
			<description><![CDATA[David Miscavage perfected reverse Scientology. He has his own code and his own tr's. A Scientology auditer listens, but DM just pretends to listen. An auditor never evaluates or invalidates, DM always evaluates and invalidates. An auditor frees up charge, DM creates charge. Also, think of a churchie "ethics" officer under DM. These guys also pretend to listen, but they listen selectively for the purpose of assigning lower conditions. hat I am trying to describe is called Black Scientology, just like DM's practice of canceling clear certs, so that OTs could receive Black Dianetics. I think we have spotted DM's game. Bingo!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:24:19 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1602</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Miscavige vs Mayo</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1598</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I just re-read this excellent post Steve, thank you for posting this. There is absolutely nothing that infuriates me more in all of Scientology than the way David Mayo has been treated. Minerva could have made the "Marcus Brutus" page on the criminality of Miscavige to Mayo. Miscavige is the ultimate Brutus and Brute. David Mayo was an exemplary Scientologist. He was a gentleman. He had honor. He saved LRH's life. He was a monumental CS and a stellar SO member. Examine David Mayo's conduct and products in Tech against the savage brutality of DM who beats, punches, humiliates, screams, dominates, throws temper tantrums and uses abusive language. Now please compare the language, the manners, the tone and intent of a David Miscavige dispatch compared to Steve Hall's posting above. WARNING: Foul Language (Mike Rinder and others have confirmed the foulest vilest unconscionable language used by this "religious leader" is a daily occurrence. Miscavige carries on like a Thug in a Drug Cartel. Miscavige is reported to have asked Tommy Davis to tell the Catholic Editors that he was equivalent to the POPE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! David Miscavige dispatch ~~ EYES ONLY CO CMO INT 4 Dec 83 SPC'L OPS RUSH - URGENT RE: SMASH SQUIRRELS PJT Marc: Godammit listen to me, you psyche indoctrimated fucking pea brain mental midget, the RTC msns went NOWHERE on handling the squirrels (marlowe is paying for that) and the longer you guys Q&A the more people are getting on Mayos lines by the minute. If we don't get something hot out this month everyone will be at the fucking AAC. Knock off the bullshit about doing an LRH cassette, NOBODY falls for them since xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I don't care how good the actor is or how much Horwhich worked it over with the Fairlite - a cassette just won't cut it. First far too many people said last year's didn't sound like the old man and if they SAID it how many do you suppose THOUGHT it wasn't him? Too goddam many. Second I don't care how good the actor is, some asshole gets the idea of a voice print and were fucked. It's got to be a VIDEO and I don't care how long these guys have been up they work arounf the fucking clock until its DONE. Third too many public think he's dead or ill or of the lines and ONLY A VIDEO WILL convince them otherwise. Four, public are going to the Fucking AAC in droves and that bastard Prices magazine with mission stats is all over the world. Get the old video clips of the old man - use ones where he's lips aren't facing the screen, looking away or looking down or you'l never PLS it. Thrown in some footage of him yelling. Pat says not to edit the pix to the sound - edit the sound to the pix - makes it more authentic that way. Dub the SMASH THE SQUIRRELS onto the video clips (NOT the New Year message) its got to look like R's personally denouncing them. Get tht video done and to me and Pat IMMEDIATELY and it had better be good and convincing, if anyone so much as suspects its not the old man i's your neck. The Xmas/New Year message goes out on cassettee not video cos the suckers will believe it if they've already seen a video of him and thinks it is a PT one. The botton line is if Mayo or any of the fucking squirrels are still in operation your ass is grass and everyone who worked on this pjt will be out for eternity and I mean for goddam EVER...Get it? (There's tapes where R says "David Mayo" - Horwich knows some so you can get all text in his voice.) DM [censored]://www.freezone.org/repor ts/e_ssqpjt.htm]]></description>
			<dc:creator>War and Peace</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:47:12 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1598</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RJ says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Mayo wasn't perfect but he was a hell a lot better than what passes today for "technical supervision" and "quality control". He didn't invalidate auditors, either which seems to be the current trend in the organization these days. Yes Alex you can get away with running lower level Dianetics on cases. This was done during the development of Standard Dianetics and ExDn. However, NED changed all that for some reason or let's just say reasons PreOTs had trouble running it. A lot! Besides lower level Dianetics wasn't designed to handle an OT as an OT. NOTs was. That said. Putting someone on lower level NED who has run III, even if they didn't go clear is pretty much asking for trouble. Yeah you might get away with it. Just like you might get away with auditing power or VA on someone who is clear or running AESPs on Int. It's the same sorta thing. Regarding Sec Checks. Originally 6 months checks weren't Sec Checks. They were ...well six months checks, usually a D of P and any review if needed then back on the level. Not what they call "six months checks" now. More accurately they could call it what CIA eu[censored]emistically calls torture, i.e. "enhanced interrogation techniques".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:27:57 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AlexMetheny says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow Thoughtful that was great!! I had read a debried from David Mayo a few months ago and got this reality then. The whole 3-D engram keeps dissolving. It would be intersting to find out if LRH was getting sec checked every 6 months while he was on Solo Nots, somehow I doubt it. Wouldn't that be standard tech? Why would it be good for us to be sec checked every 6 months and not LRH? I recieved NED auditing while on Solo Nots and did not get any adverse effects from it, but that doesnt mean it was a correct action. Very few things can cause me bad mental reactions, with the exception of constant and continual sec checking. It is like a horrible overrun and an inval and eval of your beingness and basic goodness. I appreciate your tenacity Steve for all your work and dedication and intelligence. I have longed for someone in the group to spot real WHY's and handlings for a very long time now. I know you don't have to be doing this but am very glad that you are. ML, Alex Metheny]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AlexMetheny</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:43:52 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1594</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks!</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1589</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thank you so very much for the above information and for what you've done for LRH.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Notsaware</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:28:32 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1589</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Declaration of David Mayo</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1588</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I go back to the mid 70s. Was on staff in Hawaii. I always found it amazing that LRH's personal Auditor, David Mayo, would be declared an SP. I'm not sure of the time line, but was it Little Dicky (DM) that did it? And, how, I ask you, could LRH not know that his personal auditor was a squirrel? Are all the best people from the old days now gone or declared? Is DM the true definition of a sociopath? Of course, the last line is rhetorical.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Surfer Dude</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:26:23 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1588</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wow!</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1585</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Has anyone seen the 20-page dispatch from April '82? Is it available anywhere?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Freedom Fighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:08:17 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1585</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Anonymous says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Speaking of stats, perhaps we should compare David Miscavage's stats with those of Heaven's Gate. And on the subject of a new corporate structure, I believe that will become obvious in the next 24 months, after the dust settles on the old corporate structure. (I believe David Miscavage will be going to the Big House to become Bubba's new bitch by then,and the old corporate structure will be bankrupted by class action suits in response to D. M.'s taking over of the technical hat from Mayo)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:40:21 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1582</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ronald says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1581</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow! I started in Scientology in '91 so all I ever heard of Mayo was that he was a squirrel. However, this essay and the videos I've seen on You Tube, paint a different picture of this man. What is he up to these days?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:15:59 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1581</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OT IX - XV</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1580</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm curious why DM hasn't released at least something he calls OT IX and OT X. It would be a huge money-spinner for him. Paul]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Adams</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:49:00 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1580</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thank you</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1579</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was a pc at Flag receiving NED in 1978 -- it was lightening itself. Loved my first few seasons. And THEN -- the mass moved in and I thought I was going to die. I begged, pleaded and cried with my auditor - Sue Walker to just PLEASE let me end the season and go to sleep. This went on for days -- and finally by my GOOD LUCK -- I was called on Mission and whew -- that was it for NED auditing. During my Mission briefing the HCOB on not auditing OTs on NED came out. Heaven!!! I was spared future outrageous headaches and possibly worse. This story about LRH on his death bed is 100% real to me. Wonderful that David Mayo has sent you thism thoughtful ... and yes ... I'm sure LRH knew what the future without him just might become. Fortunately enough people remembered what LRH wanted to achieve and have come back to guide the ship. Love, WH]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Windhorse</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:18:14 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1579</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>It\'s Fact! Really?</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1592</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, here's your answer Paul: "This is a simple statement of facts: "Superpower is coming this year. OT IX is coming this year. These are stated objectives from Int Management, and the SO teams involved are flat out to make these happen." This was news via email from a Flag Office. Funny you ask. There is that story about Pat Broeker asking Mayo to do something exactly like this. Now that we can predict DM's behavior, who wants to to be among the first to do these?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fellow Traveller</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:52:50 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1592</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Guest says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thoughtful --- OM(F)G!!! Now it makes PERFECT sense -- I didn't even connect the dots but you and others probably did. CANCEL Clear for all the OTS -- and thereby allow them to get NED auditing -- it THIS true? Are OT getting NED audting -- not NED for OTS but just plain powerful laser lightning NED? If this is the case -- its actually a miracle that all OT IIIs and above who are audited on NED aren't DEAD. Honestly, I've never experienced headaches before in my life -- and never again since then BUT during those NED sessions - I was beyond pain. Perhaps some of the OTs on this blog and others who had their Clear certs canceled can weigh in on what NED auditing they then received. WH]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:50:41 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1591</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How I received the article</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1587</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi WH, I guess that's why Miscavige started canceling Clear attests and putting OTs back on NED. Actually I didn't receive the article from David Mayo. All I know is I read the black PR written against Mayo by David Miscavige nearly 30 years ago. And based on what I know about Miscavige, only a dedicated fool would not realize he has been force-fed false data. The consistent pattern I saw and experienced with my own eyes at Int from 1984 to 2004, and as far as I know ALL the data Miscavige ever put out, was embroidered false data. Miscavige's primary black PR about Mayo was that Mayo was trying to be the new "Source." Well, who is the new Source now, even senior to LRH? David Miscavige. I have seen so much of Miscavige's black PR on everyone I know at Int including myself. Sometimes it's easy to forget that all these people were essentially volunteers; selflessly devoted Scientologists willing to give up having a normal life to accomplish a greater good. Like everyone else, Mayo agreed to live in the poverty in the Sea Org. The only person I know who didn't do that was David Miscavige. His income figures from even as early as 1989 showed him making $60,000 a year. I doubt I even earned $2,000 that year. Miscavige didn't suddenly "become" an SP. Now that he has been exposed, per the Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation, per the PTS/SP materials, we can predict that everything Miscavige ever wrote or said was either an outright lie, or outright propaganda designed to weaken his rivals -- like Mary Sue Hubbard -- and strengthen and confirm his power. I am applying the LRH datum from the Way to Happiness, Look. See what you see, not what someone tells you that you see.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:07:14 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1587</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Trey Lotz says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1577</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for posting this. This and other recent posts have been very helpful in sorting out fact from fiction concerning how we got to where we are today. David comes across as sane and credible, a real Tech terminal. If he had been able to follow the path that LRH had laid out for him, we would have today in the Church something so much closer to the real spirit of Scientology than what we do have. The fact that it was David Mayo that LRH called on when he was in trouble speaks volumes about him.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Trey Lotz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:54:21 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/lrhs-legacy.html#comment-1577</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
