<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AC360 - A Brief Analysis</title>
		<description>Discuss AC360 - A Brief Analysis</description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:49:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/296.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Deseara in the desert</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2197</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Let's just examine your statement against the Data Series: 1. Your statement as to "our" intentions is unsubstantiated. Outpoint: ASSUMED IDENTITIES NOT IDENTICAL 2. Your statement as to our intentions is untrue. Outpoint: FALSEHOOD 3. You are using generalities "ally with enemies" -- what enemies exactly? Outpoint: OMITTED FACT 4. Have you even gotten into comm with these suspected enemies to find out what their actual intentions are? Have you applied precepts "Look" and "Learn" are you just making assumptions? What happened to your ability to confront life? Outpoint: ASSUMED IDENTITIES NOT IDENTICAL 5. You have a huge button on the word "cult" that needs to be flattened, i.e., your TRs are out. Outpoint: ADDED INAPPLICABLE 6. You are only concerned with the "members" of Scientology-cult and aren't even commenting on the subject thus you are missing the whole point. Outpoint: WRONG TARGET 7. You assume the Church is not a cult yet all indications confirm that it is. Outpoint: ASSUMED DIFFERENCES NOT DIFFERENT 8. You equate Scientology and the Church of Scientology as the same thing. They are not even remotely the same. Outpoint: ASSUMED IDENTITIES NOT IDENTICAL 9. You presume to have DM's pet super-human ability to not only see inside the minds of others, but to detect and deduce the nature of their personal intentions when you are patently unable to do so. Outpoint: FALSEHOOD, ADDED INAPPLICABLE PTSNESS 10. Per LRH discoveries about the mind, the illogical things you accuse others of are actually what you yourself are guilty of. Outpoint: WRONG SOURCE 11. You also make one of DM's pet jabs, and a method he uses frequently to introvert people i.e. the "and you know it" statement at the end. How would you know? Super-human powers again? Outpoint: ADDED INAPPLICABLE SUPPRESSION OUTPOINT COUNT: ASSUMED "IDENTITIES" ARE NOT IDENTICAL - 3 ADDED INAPPLICABLE DATA - 3 FALSEHOOD - 2 OMITTED FACT - 1 WRONG TARGET - 1 WRONG SOURCE - 1 ASSUMED "DIFFERENCES" ARE NOT DIFFERENT - 1 All the outpoints came from you. WHY: YOU ARE PTS.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:05:49 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2197</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Deseara says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2190</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think that those who are members of this website "Scientology-cult" pretend to be behind only actions that are pure "Source" materials, but in fact have positioned themselves with enemy lines of "cult" knowingly and with the intention to destroy Scientology. It is one thing to expose DM and his off source evil actions, quite another to ally with enemies and you know it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Deseara</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:30:14 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2190</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TRUTH says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2007</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Spot on! This is a great post. Thank you! Peter, I guess you have been too reasonable with Miscavige. 1.5 is a pretty high tone level for that midget. He is chronically way way down on the tone scale.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TRUTH</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:06:37 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2007</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Had forgotten that one</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2001</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good find! They have really gone too far, they're not believable at all. Just to add my own 5 cents: TRULY FORGIVEN It is interesting to me how such a huge flap in the life of Tiger Woods, which was a worldwide flap, would result in him being forgiven and welcomed back. All he did was come out and be honest about how he screwed up, did his penance, took his knocks and is now getting on with his life. The public have signed his "Liability" formula, even his wife has. That just goes to show that if one comes clean and honestly works to make up the damage, one is forgiven. It is a point of common decency in the public at large, why can it not be used within the CofS according to the writings of LRH? It is most likely this common decency that has prompted public support of Marty and Mike. They have been honest about doing or condoning things they knew were wrong. They are taking actions to make up the damage, thus they are believed and forgiven. TD, dmettes, et al on behalf of dm are not believed and thus are despised and will never gain public support. I am a big fan of Tiger Woods and have gladly signed his formula, so to speak. I'm glad he's back and wish him well. [censored]://sports.yahoo.com/golf/ blog/devil_ball_golf/post/Tiger-Woo ds-owns-up-to-mistakes-looks-forwar d-t?urn=golf,232143]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ceileen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:21:26 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-2001</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Spot on!</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1999</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Boy, you definitely nailed it! Little boy indeed!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Freedom Fighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:10:35 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1999</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dave Miscarriage is cronic 1.5 = FASCIST]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:23:17 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Plain Old Thetan</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1997</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Spot on! Bravo! You nailed it! "And that's the way it is!"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Surf Dude</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:57:32 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1997</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Guest says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1996</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Quote: Anyone who disagrees with their planned totalitarian rule is pronounced "insane." We already know DM is in a psychiatric valence. Like Pavlov electric shocking dogs, DM teaches by PAIN, BRUTALITY, SADISM. He is even trying to paint Marty insane and Anderson Cooper as an electric shock victum. !!!!!!!!!!!! Of course this completely backfires and would make the public think ECT was no harm, given Anderson's success, coherence, mental faculties and so on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:29:14 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1996</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>reputation</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1995</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this. We watched the series -- each of the episodes two or three times as they were posted online. After reflecting on it, we feel that the series will have destroyed DM's reputation in the world with non-Scientologist political, religious and social leaders. Who would want to be associated with a person like him?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pink Panther</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:57:10 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1995</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marta says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1993</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nailed it. Bullseye. Terrific analysis and precise reference. Thanks, Plain Old Thetan, it was a terrific read this morning.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marta</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:37:06 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ac360-brief-analysis.html#comment-1993</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
