<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>1984 SP Declare on Miscavige</title>
		<description>Discuss 1984 SP Declare on Miscavige</description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/1984-sp-declare-on-david-miscavige.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:15:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/390.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>This is Disturbing</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/1984-sp-declare-on-david-miscavige.html#comment-2988</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This document is amazing, but disturbing. Why, after such an early and extremely accurate assessment of Miscavige, was this declare not enforced? How did such a vital thing not come to pass? What was the mechanism that Miscavige used? Was the OT Committee UK not important enough? Not enough authority as per standard Scientology? Another thing that bothered me is this (and this is sensitive, so I apologize if what I'm going to say is a bit upsetting): "And Scientologist supporting Miscavige's usurpation of power is guilty of the High Crime of Mutiny." This means that Marty and Mike (among many, many others) are technically guilty of the High Crime of Mutiny (assuming that they were active as Scientologists at the time; I'm almost certain that they were). True, by leaving the Miscavige Cult and becoming such strong and courageous advocates for reform and truth they have almost certainly made more than enough amends. However -- although most of us readers and followers of this saga know that both of them (and many others) have clearly explained why they made such gross errors in judgment and bought into DM's madness for so long (and even expressed considerable remorse about it) -- this problem should be addressed briefly here, vis-a-vis this declare and particularly that last paragra[censored]. I believe that this is important because Marty and Mike were too vital while with Miscavige and equally vital as Independents. Otherwise, this declare is, in a sense, an invalid document to use against DM on this site (although it would still retain its power to sway folks in the right direction). JC PS: I've posted before and I'll repeat that I'm not a Scientologist, but I do care because you guys are going in the right direction and that's important. I do not share your religious views, but I do appreciate that Scientology could be good if it is kept pure, affordable and if the church does not mess with people (which in turn would prevent any normal person or group of people from attacking it). This is what you guys are trying to do, so kudos to you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>La Mano Gaucha</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:49:05 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/1984-sp-declare-on-david-miscavige.html#comment-2988</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mary McConnell says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/1984-sp-declare-on-david-miscavige.html#comment-2986</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This document has been around for a while. The members of the OTC WW UK were all out of the church since 81 or 82 and this was their BOI. Here is the full doc with particulars for each finding. [censored]://www.davidmiscavige.wik iscientology.org/text/OTC_WW_UK_Con ditions_Order_Nr._1_Committee_of_Ev idence_-_Findings_and_Recommandatio ns_-_Interested_Party_:_David_Misca vige_28._May_1984 For example, on 1. MUTINY: GUILTY it says: Definition: Admin Dictionary Revolt and often forceful resistance against a constructive authority – New World Dictionary Open revolt against constructive authority Evidence by John Nelson, (ex-CO CMO Int. Dec. 81 – 82) shows that David Miscavige, at that time Chairman of the All Cear Unit, falsified in June 1981 a letter from LRH to take Diana Voegeding (CO CMO INT) off post. She was at that time David Miscavige’s constitutional senior. and so on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mary McConnell</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:43:52 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/1984-sp-declare-on-david-miscavige.html#comment-2986</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
