<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Bad Control: Reverse Scientology</title>
		<description>Discuss Bad Control: Reverse Scientology</description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:47:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/403.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Independent scientologist</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Aside from being stark, raving mad, he's the SP's SP. Anything he can do to keep one and all from finding him out. He has declared every single competent auditor, CS and admin terminal...His goal is to nullify and suppress. It should be pretty obvious by now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Penny Krieger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:21:32 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3570</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Barney Rubble says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wonder how many seats at that event were filled by staff- my guess probably half. And that's precisely why you have applauds for crazy dictatorial "presentations". Does anyone still on the inside know what the percentage of VIII's that were really there.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Barney Rubble</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:49:45 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3174</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>it\'s deliberate</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3171</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't think it is "bad" control or "no" control. I think it is deliberate control towards the end of purging official Scientology of any individual that is a free thinker or a dissenting voice to out and out full-on tyrannical control with all Scientologists who are "in" following orders without question. All that will remain once this purging process is complete are youngsters who do not know any better or anything else and party-liners who obey and believe without question. Once that happens, there will be no one to remember what once was, LRH good and bad, and what happened to the original management structures. As far as I know these were somewhat documented in the OEC volumes, but not fully and so it is easy enough to present these as being the result of an LRH advice or from an evaluation fully done. No one will question it, no one knows any different. The weakest area of policy implementation IMO is not at the level of policy at all. It is at the level of workaday and unquestioned directives such as statistics, VFPs, Org Boards, routing forms, checklists, and executive directives. These are issued and assumed to be correct but I believe that they are the actual held down 7s behind this debacle. Consider this: the routing form for a new Flag pre-OT has all kinds of steps on it, including REQUIRED participation in IAS by making it a mandatory routing form step. On the leaving org form, visiting with each and every ABLE office and the WISE office is REQUIRED. Also consider the impact of HCO having the statistic Qualified Staff Hired, instead of a statistic that reflects sane establishment of an org. Its push push push on recruitment of anyone by any means to get that stat up and keep it up. And of course, its impossible to do that very well when unhatted staff are on the lines and so the recruitment pool dwindles and so the HCO people are under the gun and then they are RPFed and excuse me, but how exactly does that statistic reflect the purpose of HCO, which is to build an org that can truly DELIVER? Of course, since they can never be truly upstat, then they can never get any auditing. Accident? Deliberate? Who knows. The intent doesn't really matter, when you can see the result very clearly. The road to hell can be paved with good or bad intentions. Its still the road to hell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:34:47 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3171</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Good points...</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would add that if one were in such a sorry state as to care about the "status level" one was at in terms of IAS donations, well, they couldn't even finish that. Just when one gets to the top as a patron, there was the "double patron", then all kinds of new patron levels,"patron ad nauseam"...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:17:22 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3168</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Excellent observation</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3165</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My number one issue is Bad Control. It's everywhere (generality, but true). So vwd on connecting the outpoints.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>no thank you</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:54:44 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3165</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>oorah</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3164</link>
			<description><![CDATA[this guy's sellin the same courses to the same public in a different wrapper and the sad thing is the public are buying the b.s. Talk about the blind leading the blind leading the blind.......we ought to set up a cemetery near flag and hang a sign "FOR FSO PUBLIC ONLY"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Perikles</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:43:35 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3164</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Me says:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh, believe me, some of us public saw it. The Basic's BS was the last straw for some and now the new bottom of the Bridge shit is coming out soon. Mostly people who are trained see it, but some haven't quite figured out what is going on yet. LRH's tech is almost no where in sight with all the "lost" tech found. He is getting rid of all the trained old timers and training any new public or second generation public coming in as droids. The house of cards will fall one day. His joke is not funny.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:45:54 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/bad-control-reverse-scientology.html#comment-3167</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
