<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>"Look!"</title>
		<description>Discuss "Look!"</description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:48:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/415.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>RE: RE: &quot;Look!&quot;</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3763</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lamoore, brilliant questions. I would suggest this as general approach: 1. HCO PL 30 Jan 83, YOUR POST AND LIFE „If one is experiencing an adverse effect on post or in life, then he does not know or has not applied the tech or policy covering it.“ So after realizing that you and me experience an adverse effect the question comes up „WHAT tech or policy covers the situation? 2. Investigate and list out what areas of tech are concerned that were not known or not applied. 3. Then evaluate the importances according to „what application of which tech will bring the fastest effective recovery of the situation?“ 4. Learn and/or apply any such tech in the sequence resulting from #3. What specific tech or bulletin or policy applies depends on #2 and 3 above. If you wish me to be more specific to the current situation, let me know. I will try to answer it as good as I can and as possible in a short comment. Worsel]]></description>
			<dc:creator>worsel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:51:53 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3763</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: &quot;Look!&quot;</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[“Without affinity there is no reality or communication.” Any questions? Written by Worsel Yes. One. How can such a thing be prevented from happening again? In terms of Global Scientology? As a purely practical matter. OK two, What tech or which bulletins or writings of Ron address the resolution of this bizarre possibility come true?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>lamoore</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:37:09 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3700</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: &quot;Look!&quot;</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3430</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Observing DM's tone levels, do you suppose Tommy Davis finds sitting up straight is difficult after a boudoir session with his boss? Just curious.....DM attracted by homosexual leanings?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pericles</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:05:32 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3430</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: RE:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3362</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wondeful opportunity for confronting. Great first hand observations.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Worsel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:58:11 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3362</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>More on DM's chronic emotional tones</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3357</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes -- not a drop of ARC in him. His social tone level is fixed in the anger band: 1.9 HOSTILITY 1.8 PAIN 1.5 ANGER 1.4 HATE 1.3 RESENTMENT 1.2 NO SYMPATHY 1.15 UNEXPRESSED RESENTMENT As a being, he exists strictly in the sub-apathy range as Worsel pointed out. What Scientologists are mistakenly calling that "great Tone 40 look" is most of the time the emotion of "UNEXPRESSED RESENTMENT." That is DM's normal "look" when he's looking at you but not speaking. Yeah, DM has "a great Tone 40 look"... and what comes out the back end of a dog is chocolate mousse, boiling-hot tar is delicious and Tommy Davis is nobody's lacky boy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:52:28 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3357</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: &quot;Look!&quot;</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Long time ago already, just looking at his pictures I saw the evil, no drop of ARC in him. At Flag I have been told "he has such a great Tone 40 look". Hahahahahahahaha. And at that time I did not know about all his "little missbehaviours". Good article, well said.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ildi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:23:18 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3354</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the mid seventies one had occasion to shake the hand of the aforementioned individual and look directly into those cold empty pale blue eyes. Altho' only about 14 at the time, even then, there was a deadness behind those glassy orbs. It left one feeling empty, cold and severely unacknowledged and his hands were cold to the touch.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Pericles</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:49:07 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3329</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: RE: &quot;Look!&quot;</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3310</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am glad that essay helped in regard to that. The tone scale didn't seem to work for me for decades, until I understood at one point that Ron is just using a different word for it ("sub-apathy"). After that the whole broad field of these data opened and I use it heavily since. I was surprised, how many peolpe were in that band, who I had looked at falsely higher before.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Worsel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:53:08 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3310</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: &quot;Look!&quot;</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3307</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The eyes of a ferret just before he disembowels a rabbit. That said I really want to thank you for helping me understand the lower tone scale for the first time in decades!!! It has opened the door to far more understanding of myself and others. E]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kingair350</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:31:43 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3307</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE:</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[well said I must say!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hadley</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 14:26:14 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3303</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: &quot;Look!&quot;</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3290</link>
			<description><![CDATA[excellent posting. This should get people looking! Thank you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:12:15 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/look.html#comment-3290</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
