<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Waking up</title>
		<description>Discuss Waking up</description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/waking-up.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:49:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/432.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>RE: RE: Waking up</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/waking-up.html#comment-3653</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Quicksilver, you are absolutely right. Not being flat on help, this person seems to follow the steps you outlined, indeed. The hardest for me was to break through that dispersal that started when I was confronted with these facts. I couldn't just confront it. I had to find explanations and all, to account for the divergence from my picture of "a scientologist". But finally I managed to apply the confusion formula. I realized why there is the lowest confront on evil: Because a being is good and to duplicate evil it requires to overcome the widest difference to being good. How can ARC duplicate non-ARC? The drill to re-adjust one's confront when it starts to disperse was the key for me.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Worsel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:11:20 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/waking-up.html#comment-3653</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Waking up</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/waking-up.html#comment-3651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great write-up Worsel. Man, this person you described is one poor example of an OT Vlll. It appears to me she hasn't even made it on Grades. Totally into herself, a serfac that she operates thru, status hungry, being interestING instead of interestED, and has totally missed Scientology. I understand you thanking her for the wake-up ... her condition is nothing to aspire to - if anything she is one to be avoided. I doubt if she would allow herself to be helped - she would have to have someone say 'No', then she'd cave in, then it would be possible - a long road, but possible. Thanks again for the article. Do well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Quicksilver</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:50:07 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/waking-up.html#comment-3651</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Waking up</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/waking-up.html#comment-3648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Worsel for that excellent piece.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:46:02 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/waking-up.html#comment-3648</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
