<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ragne Mansfield</title>
		<description>Discuss Ragne Mansfield</description>
		<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:47:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://mail.scientology-cult.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/463.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>RE: Ragne Mansfield</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4872</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you Ragne, thank you very much!! I am following my nose and my knowledge on the matter of what I would call "David Miscaviage's sinister edits, seemingly sinister alliances and sinister declares." WE!(you and I and all Independant SCN's are the "church" of Scientology by root and original meaning of church, as revealed in the Greek.) PDC #20 : ) big smiles and goodness, a Friend]]></description>
			<dc:creator>a friend</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:15:05 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4872</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: RE: Ragne Mansfield</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4228</link>
			<description><![CDATA[James, That is a great comment. Thank you for that piece of insight. - Steve]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Thoughtful</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:24:30 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4228</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Ragne Mansfield</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4225</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well done! BTW, as we know, DM is a USURPER. It's not his Church. He did not build it. LRH and those of us who worked on staff, who FSMed, or who donated built the Church. DM is living off of the goodwill and hard work of thousands of others. It is not his church. It is your church and the church of everyone who contributed. I suggest we not validate his usurping actions. So, I suggest we not call the Church, the "Church of Miscavige" or any such thing that implies that it is his. Similarly, to call what he is doing "radical Scientology" or such is an insult to the Tech. A better term is "psuedo-Scientology." "Reverse Scientology" is also good. We know from the L&N tech and HCO PL "Misunderstood Words, Goofs," that how we name things - the words we choose - have wide ranging effects, on things like our evals and action plans. It's not DM's church. Ethically, it belongs to those who created it. Not to one who is destroying it. James]]></description>
			<dc:creator>James Lawson, Jr.</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:54:24 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4225</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Ragne Mansfield</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4209</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great Ragne that you´ve done your Doubt public so as to inspire others!!!:))) Together we are strong! Much Love Conny]]></description>
			<dc:creator>conny lundberg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:55:59 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4209</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>RE: Ragne Mansfield</title>
			<link>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4205</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ragne, There is now doubt that the Church of Scientology has been seized by individuals hostile to Scientology. No doubt that their intention is to alter and pervert the tech within the organization which they have succeeded in doing. What I feel they fear the most is the technology that will make actual OTs (as in Operating Thetan that is one that can *operate* exterior to the body and perceive) this is the reason for the technical degrade of the original OT Levels by replacing them with "New" OT Levels they immediately imply that they are "Old" and "no longer used". If it wasn't for us they might have been successful. Fortunately SPs rarely are or are only "successful" for only a short period of time like their unwitting agent David Miscavige. Though two decades may seem like a long time it is really a brief respite in eternity. What is in store for him and his "friends" up the line I wouldn't wish on my own worst enemy.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:19:29 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid>https://mail.scientology-cult.com/ragne-mansfield.html#comment-4205</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
